
Generative AI changes the basic assumption behind football image rights clauses. For years, clubs negotiated the right to capture and reuse a player’s identity through photographs, video, interviews and promotional content. AI now goes further. It can generate new images, clone voices, simulate messages, localize campaigns, create avatars and turn player material into model input that may outlive the relationship. This matters most in club-player arrangements, whether the wording sits in the employment contract or in a separate image rights agreement. The same logic applies to endorsement, sponsorship and licensing deals. The practical lesson is simple: technical editing, synthetic content, model training, digital replicas, sponsor endorsement and post-term use are different acts. They should not be approved, priced or controlled under one broad “all media” clause.
Introduction
In football, image rights usually appear in one of two places. They may be included in the employment contract, often in a short clause. Alternatively, they may sit in a separate but connected image rights agreement. In both cases, the commercial question is the same: who may use the player’s identity, for what purpose, for how long, on which platforms and for whose...
Football Legal is an independent media publishing football law contents on a daily basis
dedicated to all football law practitioners (lawyers, clubs, federations,
intermediaries, football stakeholders, etc.).
Register today and stay tuned to the latest legal news.
Why not join us?